<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.antoniomachado.net/category/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.antoniomachado.net/category/science/</link>
	<description>Antonio Machado, Ph. D. Multipurpose biologist (Entomology, Nature conservation, Environmental policy, etc.) based in the Canary Islands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>A PHYSICAL VIEW ABOUT THE NATURE OF THINGS, THOUGHTS, AND BELIEFS</title>
		<link>https://www.antoniomachado.net/articulo-de-prensa/</link>
					<comments>https://www.antoniomachado.net/articulo-de-prensa/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonio Machado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-original]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniomachado.net/2015/?p=418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>La entrada <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net/articulo-de-prensa/">A PHYSICAL VIEW ABOUT THE NATURE OF THINGS, THOUGHTS, AND BELIEFS</a> aparece primero en <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net">www.antoniomachado.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpb-content-wrapper"><div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element" >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>&#8211; I &#8211;</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Energy, matter, time and information, started with the so called Big-Bang.</li>
<li>If there is existence, there is time; and vice versa.</li>
<li>What existed before the Big Bang (energy? Information?), we do not know and cannot know.</li>
<li>There may be other universes, but we don’t know.</li>
<li>The (our) universe started with a first asymmetry that introduced a variational principle.</li>
<li>The variational principle may be related to temperature or information; we don’t know.</li>
<li>It seems that the universe evolves towards complexity, gaining information and getting colder.</li>
<li>In any exchange of energy and matter, there is a change of information.</li>
<li>Information (very likely as entropy) is a property or state descriptor of matter.</li>
<li>Information, linked to the form of matter, can be structural or functional.</li>
<li>Functional information has an effect on other informed systems that are capable to process it.</li>
<li>More informed systems can do more with small incomes of information, than less informed.</li>
<li>The increase in size of things can be linked to better perform informational processes.</li>
<li>Complexity relates to the level and kind of interactions between components of a given system.</li>
<li>The evolution of information towards complexity (up to communication) is a universal trend.</li>
<li>Accumulated (historical) Information favors exchange of energy and matter towards progress.</li>
<li>A system progresses when it gains more independence from the external environment.</li>
<li>Persistence is a trend in complex adaptive systems (stronger the more informed the system is).</li>
<li>Matter (informed) evolves more rapidly when complex adaptive systems build up.</li>
<li>Life (living matter) is an emergent property of inert matter and can be distinguished by its behavior.</li>
<li>Living systems are dissipative, self-maintaining, and mnemonic fostered by autocatalytic chemistry.</li>
<li>Life evolves openly in a contingent universe, and tends to expands as much as it can.</li>
<li>Biodiversity is a consequence of the process of life and contingencies (no determinism at all).</li>
<li>Genetic mutations are not directed. Hence, there is no goal or purpose in evolution (no teleology).</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>&#8211; II &#8211;</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The mind (thinking matter) is an emergent property of life can and be distinguished by its behavior.</li>
<li>The emergence of mind may be a consequence of chaos or of the progressive evolution of matter.</li>
<li>The mind manages highly structured information and permits communication and propagation of it.</li>
<li>The mind is a complex adaptive system that fostered cultural evolution.</li>
<li>Cultural evolution is much faster than ordinary biological evolution which follows the genetic way.</li>
<li>With the mind, determinism (voluntary) started in our known Universe.</li>
<li>With the mind, consciousness started in our known Universe.</li>
<li>For convention, we use the term nature for things that exist prior to mankind or without its intervention</li>
<li>For convention, we term the effects of the mind as anthropic, and their products as artificial.</li>
<li>Our species evolves (in the natural and artificial environment) but not in the Darwinian way anymore.</li>
<li>In planet Earth we have at present inert matter, living matter and thinking matter.</li>
<li>In planet Earth we have a hydrosphere, a lithosphere, an atmosphere a biosphere, and a psychosphere.</li>
<li>The psychosphere has expanded outside the physical limits of the other spheres of planet Earth.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>&#8211; III- </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>As observer, we are bearers of knowledge.</li>
<li>The observer influences the observation. Hence, observations are subjective.</li>
<li>Observations can be real or illusory.</li>
<li>Real is what has a physical entity (measurable). Hence, reality is supported by matter.</li>
<li>Illusory is what is seen as real but is not.</li>
<li>Our observations and deductions tend to be anthropocentric or anthropomorphic.</li>
<li>Knowledge is an ensemble of mental representations (ideas) of things and events, present or past.</li>
<li>An idea is real; what it represents may or may not. Ideas have a material (neurochemical) basis.</li>
<li>The senses and accumulated experience (historical knowledge) play a role in observations.</li>
<li>Deduced and inferred ‘reality’ may be real or illusory.</li>
<li>Artistic (passion) knowledge is subjective, not dialectic and linked to instinct, intuition or creativity.</li>
<li>Revealed knowledge is external, objective and also not dialectic (never tested, only interpreted).</li>
<li>Scientific knowledge seeks objectivity, is intelligible and highly dialectic (submitted to proof).</li>
<li>We use these three basic kinds of knowledge to move around in our lives.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>&#8211; IV &#8211;</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The basics of rational capacity are ‘wired’ on causal-effect procedures of the supporting brain.</li>
<li>We build abstract ideas with our rational capacity to form coherent interpretations of gained knowledge</li>
<li>We firstly seek and gain knowledge from ourselves and the environment, for moving safely around.</li>
<li>We also use our rational capacity for seeking complaisance and for avoiding pain, fear, and anxiety.</li>
<li>With the emergence of mind, our species is the only one conscious of its timed persistence.</li>
<li>The use of religious beliefs is strongly rewarded by the complaisance and calmness obtained.</li>
<li>Love, universal consciousness, fraternity, and feelings alike are conceptions for the complaisance.</li>
<li>The idea of gods or a sublimated unique deity is related to the original cause-effect wiring of our brain.</li>
<li>The mind is free to think without limits (as far as we know).</li>
<li>If there are other forms of life after the present form of life, we don’t know (scientifically).</li>
<li>The mind is free to believe anything so long it is maintained in the realm of revealed knowledge.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"> That`s it</p>
<p><em>Reflections triggered by a text written by my daughter Laura and her mystic views of nature.<br />
A. Machado, January 2014</em></p>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
</div><p>La entrada <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net/articulo-de-prensa/">A PHYSICAL VIEW ABOUT THE NATURE OF THINGS, THOUGHTS, AND BELIEFS</a> aparece primero en <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net">www.antoniomachado.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.antoniomachado.net/articulo-de-prensa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Laparocerus?</title>
		<link>https://www.antoniomachado.net/why-laparocerus/</link>
					<comments>https://www.antoniomachado.net/why-laparocerus/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonio Machado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-original]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniomachado.net/?p=6659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1992, I concluded a fifteen-year extensive study of the ground-beetle fauna of the Canary Islands. Obviously, my interest in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>La entrada <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net/why-laparocerus/">Why Laparocerus?</a> aparece primero en <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net">www.antoniomachado.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1992, I concluded a fifteen-year extensive study of the ground-beetle fauna of the Canary Islands. Obviously, my interest in beetles and island evolution was not exhausted, but spurred on. Thus, I looked for another group of insects where speciation and eventual evolution patterns could be studied in more depth and coherently. I designed the profile of the ideal candidate: preferably a species-rich genus, with all species being flightless, present in as many islands and habitats as possible, and the whole set be monophyletic. No doubt, oceanic islands would be the place to look for it.</p>
<p>A few candidates were available (<em>Tarphius</em>, <em>Cardiophorus</em>, <em>Hegeter</em>, etc.) but <em>Laparocerus</em> was clearly the best option. No other genus had so many species ascribed to it, and all of them being endemic to Macaronesia. Some 130 species-level taxa were known from the Azores, Madeira, Selvagens, and the Canaries, plus one species from the Macaronesian enclave in North Africa. Each island, inhabited by several species ─ mostly monoinsular endemics ─, represents a repeated evolutionary experiment of nature. Just perfect! The problem: <em>Laparocerus</em> were poorly known, not revised taxonomically, extremely variable, and difficult to find in the field; just a potential nightmare that my colleagues termed a masochist endeavour. Conversely, I found them a wonderful challenge!</p>
<p>My first gratification was to find that <em>Laparocerus</em> were rare in collections, but not in nature, at least, during the night. Being nocturnal, these weevils hide underground during the day and that is why by-catches were so uncommon. At night they come out to feed in hundreds! Needless to say that I became a compulsive nocturnal entomologist, discovering that insect life is much fun when it is dark.</p>
<p>I initiated a strategic field prospection throughout all Macaronesia, a complete taxonomic revision and a phylogenetic study based on mitochondrial DNA data. My professional duties did not allow me to dedicate myself full time to the <em>Laparocerus</em> study, but after thirteen years of spattered dedication and over 30.000 specimens studied, the overall picture is getting sharper. <em>Laparocerus</em> species have increased to nearly 200 taxa, an absolute record of biodiversity in Macaronesia. I established several synonyms and some important changes have been fixed or are still in the pipeline. Species from the Azores, for instance, belong to a different independent genus  (<em>Drouetius)</em>; others, like those included in the genus <em>Lichenophagus</em>, <em>Anillobius</em> or <em>Cyphoscelis</em>, are <em>Laparocerus</em>. The Madeira and Afro-Canarian clades are both monophyletic, and it is not yet clear to me if all the subclades (several subgenera) have formed within the archipelagos or split originally in Africa before their invasion took place. I hope to be able to tune up the molecular clock specifically for this group in this region, and solve that question. The divergence in forms is astonishing and the many cases involved will allow the use of statistics to reveal hidden patterns.</p>
<p>My aim with this study is to establish the basis for future spatial evolutionary researchs, and if I would be a politician, I would promise that <em>Laparocerus</em> will take Darwin finches out of the podium.</p>
<p>La entrada <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net/why-laparocerus/">Why Laparocerus?</a> aparece primero en <a href="https://www.antoniomachado.net">www.antoniomachado.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.antoniomachado.net/why-laparocerus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
